All Events and Webinars

Cyber Resilience Act Compliance Webinar

Cross Industry
AI and Emerging Technology
Leadership and Resilience
Vulnerabilities and Exposure
Supply Chain and Third Party Risks
February 4, 2026
The days of shipping software and forgetting about it are over, whether teams like it or not. This session unpacks what the EU Cyber Resilience Act actually demands, from lifecycle accountability to continuous vulnerability management. It explains how product security now extends beyond release, forcing organisations to rethink ownership, monitoring, and patching if they want to stay compliant and avoid becoming tomorrow’s cautionary breach story.

In-House Specialists

Robert Kehoe

Chief Technology Officer

Prakhya Pakala

Information Security Consultant

External Speakers

No external speakers for this session.

Key Strategic Takeaways

What Does the Cyber Resilience Act Cover?

The EU Cyber Resilience Act applies to any product with digital elements, including hardware and software components. It impacts manufacturers, importers, and distributors, including non-EU organisations selling into the EU. The regulation focuses on products rather than services, introducing direct accountability for the security of what is built and shipped.

How Does CRA Drive a Shift From Compliance to Continuous Security?

CRA moves away from periodic, audit-driven compliance toward continuous operational security. Organisations must demonstrate that controls are not only in place but actively functioning, repeatable, and measurable over time. Evidence, traceability, and real-world execution are now central requirements.

Why Does Lifecycle Security Become Mandatory Under CRA?

Security responsibility extends across the entire product lifecycle, from development through to end-of-life. It is no longer sufficient to secure a product at launch. Vulnerabilities must be continuously monitored, managed, disclosed, and remediated throughout the product’s lifespan.

What Are the Most Common Organisational Gaps When Preparing for CRA?

Many organisations face structural challenges when adapting to CRA, including:

  • Unclear ownership of product security
  • Disconnected teams across product, security, and operations
  • Limited visibility into deployed products
  • Fragmented data across multiple tools
  • Manual processes that cannot scale

These gaps make it difficult to respond quickly and provide consistent evidence during audits.

How Does Supply Chain and Dependency Risk Impact CRA Compliance?

Modern software relies heavily on third-party and open-source components. Organisations often lack visibility into indirect dependencies, making it difficult to assess exposure when vulnerabilities emerge. CRA requires the ability to identify affected products quickly and respond with confidence.

What Are the New Expectations for Vulnerability Management Under CRA?

Organisations must implement structured, repeatable processes for identifying, assessing, and remediating vulnerabilities. This includes:

  • Rapid identification of affected systems
  • Testing and validating patches before deployment
  • Communicating impact to customers
  • Meeting strict regulatory timelines for notification and remediation

Delayed or inconsistent patching approaches are no longer acceptable.

What Is Required for Evidence, Traceability, and Continuous Security Under CRA?

CRA requires organisations to prove how vulnerabilities are handled in practice, with clear records of detection, response, remediation, and ownership. Evidence must be structured, accessible, and audit-ready at all times. This reflects a broader shift from one-time compliance to continuous security, where maintaining and securing products post-launch is as critical as building them.

How Do Ownership, Standardisation, and Governance Support CRA Readiness?

Effective CRA readiness depends on clear product ownership, centralised risk visibility, and standardised response workflows. Organisations must move away from fragmented tools and manual processes toward integrated, scalable approaches. This also elevates product security to a leadership concern, requiring governance, accountability, and the ability to demonstrate control across the full product lifecycle.

No items found.
  • 00:00 Introduction to the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
  • 00:24 CRA scope: products with digital elements explained
  • 01:32 From compliance to continuous security monitoring
  • 02:34 Common organisational gaps and ownership issues
  • 03:48 Lifecycle security and post-launch responsibility
  • 05:35 Supply chain risk and dependency visibility challenges
  • 07:41 Cultural shift: from shipping to maintaining products
  • 09:39 Building effective security ownership and processes
  • 11:45 Managing third-party vulnerabilities in practice
  • 13:03 CRA timelines: notification and remediation expectations
  • 14:38 Leadership responsibility and governance impact
  • 16:34 Practical steps for CRA readiness
Watch More
Compliance and Risk

Seasonal Cybersecurity Risks for Transport Webinar

Smarttech247 leaders discuss transportation cybersecurity, focusing on OT security, digital twins, evolving threats, third-party risk, and resilience.

HSE Ransomware Attack and the Future of Cybersecurity in Ireland

Cybersecurity leaders discuss HSE ransomware attack and a path forward for Ireland, focusing on resilience, regulation, maturity models, and public awareness

Ransomware Cyber Attack Simulation Webinar

Attack simulation showing a multi-stage ransomware campaign and how Cybereason detects, correlates, and responds to fileless and living-off-the-land techniques.

Ready to scale your security and compliance operations?

We protect your on-premise/cloud/OT environments - 24x7x365